Tapestry, Inc. TPR
equity
Price History
The shaded fan is where this price has historically travelled over the months after a close like today’s. It is not a forecast: it has no view on direction, only on distance.
Over 3 months from Sep 2026, roughly two-thirds of past moves landed between $94.38 and $140.13; nine in ten between $83.09 and $159.17.
Tested against this asset’s own history: across 297 past 3-month windows, the price actually landed inside the two-thirds band 62% of the time. The gap from 68% is the model’s error — real returns have fatter tails than the maths assumes, so the band gets breached more often than it claims.
Time underwater
How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.
Worst drawdown: −83%, peaking Mar 2012 and bottoming Mar 2020 — 155 months below the prior high before recovering.
DCA Backtest
- Invested
- $31,200
- Value today
- $163,080
- Return
- +422.7%
- Months invested
- 312
Scenarios
Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $45,173 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +261.0%.
Lump sum instead — $31,200 all at once in Oct 2000: $1,227,979 (+3835.8%) — lump sum came out ahead.
Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (Feb 2026): $661.05 on $800 invested (-17.4%).
⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.
If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.
Every start month at once
Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | ||||||||||||
| 2001 | ||||||||||||
| 2002 | ||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||
| 2004 | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 |
About Tapestry, Inc.
Tapestry, Inc. is an American holding company based in New York City which is the parent company of Coach New York and Kate Spade New York. Originally named Coach, Inc., the business changed its name to Tapestry on October 31, 2017. (Wikipedia)
It's a listed company categorised under consumer discretionary and apparel, accessories & luxury goods, with a market cap of about $22.9B.
It rates High Risk at 2.9/5, meaning several rated factors score badly, so this carries materially more risk than a typical holding.
What pushes the score up: earnings quality (5.0/5) and market / volatility (3.7/5).
Scoring well: sector / regulatory at 1.0/5.
Not yet researched: concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.
Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.
Risk Profile
- Annualised volatility (3yr)3/539.5
- Max drawdown from ATH4/583.2
- Beta vs S&P 5004/51.4
- Avg daily $ volume1/5412.4m
- Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched
- Debt / equity5/53.4
- Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)1/516.0
- 3yr EPS volatility5/5612
- Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
- Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched
- Board independence %not yet researched
- Share structurenot yet researched
- Litigation / audit historynot yet researched
- Sector regulatory exposure1/5low
Linked Assets
Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.
- Ralph Lauren Corporation RL+60% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary, apparel, accessories & luxury goods
- Nike, Inc. NKE+43% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary, apparel, accessories & luxury goods
- Lululemon Athletica LULU+34% (weak)same category: consumer discretionary, apparel, accessories & luxury goods
- Marriott International MAR+63% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary
- Carnival Corporation CCL+57% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary
- Ulta Beauty ULTA+56% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary
- Royal Caribbean Group RCL+56% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary
- Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings NCLH+53% (moderate)same category: consumer discretionary