Take-Two Interactive TTWO

equity

Price History

1997-04 · DCA start$5.04

Time underwater

How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.

1997-042026-08 · -5.9%

Worst drawdown: −77%, peaking May 2008 and bottoming Feb 2009 — 78 months below the prior high before recovering.

DCA Backtest

Start month

Monthly amount (USD)

Invested: $35,300
Value today: $516,349
Return: +1362.7%
Months invested: 353

Scenarios

Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $53,352 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +867.8%.

Lump sum instead — $35,300 all at once in Apr 1997: $1,701,402 (+4719.8%) — lump sum came out ahead.

Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (Sep 2025): $1,250 on $1,200 invested (+4.2%).

⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.

If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.

Every start month at once

Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.

	J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Legend:−50%−20%0%+50%+200%+1000%worst timing (ATH)Selected 1997-04: +1362.7%

About Take-Two Interactive

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City co-founded by Ryan Brant and Mark E. Seremet in September 1993. (Wikipedia)

It's a listed company categorised under communication services and interactive home entertainment, with a market cap of about $45.4B.

It rates High Risk at 3.2/5, meaning several rated factors score badly, so this carries materially more risk than a typical holding.

What pushes the score up: earnings quality (5.0/5) and leverage / financial (3.5/5).

Scoring well: liquidity at 1.0/5.

Not yet researched: concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.

Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.

Risk Profile

High Risk(3.2/5)80% rated

How these ratings work

Market / Volatility3.3/5 · weight 20%

Annualised volatility (3yr)3/526.2
Max drawdown from ATH4/577.1
Beta vs S&P 5003/51.1

Liquidity1.0/5 · weight 15%

Avg daily $ volume1/5599.6m
Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched

Leverage / Financial3.5/5 · weight 20%

Debt / equity2/50.70
Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)5/5-0.73

Earnings Quality5.0/5 · weight 15%

3yr EPS volatility5/5100

Concentrationunrated · weight 10%

Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched

Governanceunrated · weight 10%

Board independence %not yet researched
Share structurenot yet researched
Litigation / audit historynot yet researched

Sector / Regulatory3.0/5 · weight 10%

Sector regulatory exposure3/5elevated

Linked Assets

Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.