Ciena CIEN
equity
Price History
The shaded fan is where this price has historically travelled over the months after a close like today’s. It is not a forecast: it has no view on direction, only on distance.
Over 3 months from Sep 2026, roughly two-thirds of past moves landed between $268.48 and $453.14; nine in ten between $226.78 and $536.47.
Tested against this asset’s own history: across 341 past 3-month windows, the price actually landed inside the two-thirds band 69% of the time. The gap from 68% is the model’s error — real returns have fatter tails than the maths assumes, so the band gets breached more often than it claims.
Time underwater
How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.
Worst drawdown: −99%, peaking Sep 2000 and bottoming Feb 2009 — still unrecovered after 312 months.
DCA Backtest
- Invested
- $35,600
- Value today
- $435,480
- Return
- +1123.3%
- Months invested
- 356
Scenarios
Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $54,081 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +705.2%.
Lump sum instead — $35,600 all at once in Feb 1997: $90,390 (+153.9%) — DCA came out ahead.
Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (Sep 2000): $424,255 on $31,300 invested (+1255.4%).
⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.
If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.
Every start month at once
Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | ||||||||||||
| 1998 | ||||||||||||
| 1999 | ||||||||||||
| 2000 | ||||||||||||
| 2001 | ||||||||||||
| 2002 | ||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||
| 2004 | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 |
About Ciena
Ciena Corporation is an American optical networking systems and software company based in Hanover, Maryland. The company reported revenues of $4.8 billion and more than 9,000 employees, as of November 2025. Gary Smith has been president and chief executive officer (CEO) since 2003. (Wikipedia)
It's a listed company categorised under information technology and communications equipment, with a market cap of about $49.5B.
It rates High Risk at 3.2/5, meaning several rated factors score badly, so this carries materially more risk than a typical holding.
What pushes the score up: earnings quality (5.0/5) and market / volatility (4.7/5).
Scoring well: sector / regulatory at 1.0/5.
Not yet researched: concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.
Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.
Risk Profile
- Annualised volatility (3yr)4/552.3
- Max drawdown from ATH5/599.4
- Beta vs S&P 5005/51.9
- Avg daily $ volume1/51.2bn
- Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched
- Debt / equity3/51.1
- Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)not yet researched
- 3yr EPS volatility5/579.6
- Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
- Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched
- Board independence %not yet researched
- Share structurenot yet researched
- Litigation / audit historynot yet researched
- Sector regulatory exposure1/5low
Linked Assets
Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.
- Cisco CSCO+52% (moderate)same category: information technology, communications equipment
- Lumentum LITE+49% (moderate)same category: information technology, communications equipment
- Motorola Solutions MSI+37% (weak)same category: information technology, communications equipment
- F5, Inc. FFIV+35% (weak)same category: information technology, communications equipment
- Arista Networks ANET+35% (weak)same category: information technology, communications equipment
- Marvell Technology MRVL+51% (moderate)same category: information technology
- Sandisk SNDK+50% (moderate)same category: information technology
- NetApp NTAP+50% (moderate)same category: information technology