CSX Corporation CSX
equity
Price History
Time underwater
How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.
Worst drawdown: −66%, peaking Jul 1997 and bottoming Apr 2000 — 105 months below the prior high before recovering.
DCA Backtest
- Invested
- $50,000
- Value today
- $1,018,851
- Return
- +1937.7%
- Months invested
- 500
Scenarios
Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $90,910 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +1020.7%.
Lump sum instead — $50,000 all at once in Jan 1985: $3,308,039 (+6516.1%) — lump sum came out ahead.
Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (Jul 2026): $199.37 on $200 invested (-0.3%).
⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.
If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.
Every start month at once
Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985 | ||||||||||||
| 1986 | ||||||||||||
| 1987 | ||||||||||||
| 1988 | ||||||||||||
| 1989 | ||||||||||||
| 1990 | ||||||||||||
| 1991 | ||||||||||||
| 1992 | ||||||||||||
| 1993 | ||||||||||||
| 1994 | ||||||||||||
| 1995 | ||||||||||||
| 1996 | ||||||||||||
| 1997 | ||||||||||||
| 1998 | ||||||||||||
| 1999 | ||||||||||||
| 2000 | ||||||||||||
| 2001 | ||||||||||||
| 2002 | ||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||
| 2004 | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 |
About CSX Corporation
CSX Corporation is an American holding company focused on rail transportation and real estate in North America, among other industries. The company was established in 1980 as part of the Chessie System and Seaboard Coast Line Industries merger. The various railroads of the former Chessie System and Seaboard Coast Line Industries that are now owned by CSX Corporation were eventually merged into a single line in 1986 and it became known as CSX Transportation. CSX Corporation currently has a number of subsidiaries beyond CSX Transportation. (Wikipedia)
It's a listed company categorised under industrials and rail transportation, with a market cap of about $92.8B.
It rates Low Risk at 1.7/5, meaning the rated factors look benign — steady pricing, deep liquidity, and no obvious structural red flags.
What pushes the score up: market / volatility (2.7/5).
Scoring well: earnings quality at 1.0/5.
Not yet researched: leverage / financial, concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.
Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.
Risk Profile
- Annualised volatility (3yr)2/521.3
- Max drawdown from ATH3/566.1
- Beta vs S&P 5003/51.0
- Avg daily $ volume1/5621.3m
- Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched
- Debt / equitynot yet researched
- Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)not yet researched
- 3yr EPS volatility1/58.7
- Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
- Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched
- Board independence %not yet researched
- Share structurenot yet researched
- Litigation / audit historynot yet researched
- Sector regulatory exposure2/5moderate
Linked Assets
Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.
- Norfolk Southern NSC+75% (strong)same category: industrials, rail transportation
- Union Pacific Corporation UNP+68% (moderate)same category: industrials, rail transportation
- Ingersoll Rand IR+65% (moderate)same category: industrials
- Emerson Electric EMR+61% (moderate)same category: industrials
- Fortive FTV+60% (moderate)same category: industrials
- Eaton Corporation ETN+59% (moderate)same category: industrials
- Caterpillar Inc. CAT+57% (moderate)same category: industrials
- Parker Hannifin PH+57% (moderate)same category: industrials