Verisign VRSN
equity
Price History
The shaded fan is where this price has historically travelled over the months after a close like today’s. It is not a forecast: it has no view on direction, only on distance.
Over 3 months from Sep 2026, roughly two-thirds of past moves landed between $269.2 and $341.31; nine in ten between $249.37 and $368.46.
Tested against this asset’s own history: across 330 past 3-month windows, the price actually landed inside the two-thirds band 71% of the time. The gap from 68% is the model’s error — real returns have fatter tails than the maths assumes, so the band gets breached more often than it claims.
Time underwater
How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.
Worst drawdown: −98%, peaking Feb 2000 and bottoming Sep 2002 — 262 months below the prior high before recovering.
DCA Backtest
- Invested
- $34,500
- Value today
- $299,956
- Return
- +769.4%
- Months invested
- 345
Scenarios
Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $51,793 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +479.1%.
Lump sum instead — $34,500 all at once in Jan 1998: $1,640,414 (+4654.8%) — lump sum came out ahead.
Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (Jul 2026): $309.66 on $300 invested (+3.2%).
⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.
If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.
Every start month at once
Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | ||||||||||||
| 1999 | ||||||||||||
| 2000 | ||||||||||||
| 2001 | ||||||||||||
| 2002 | ||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||
| 2004 | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 |
About Verisign
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, .web and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains. (Wikipedia)
It's a listed company categorised under information technology and internet services & infrastructure, with a market cap of about $27.4B.
It rates Medium-Low Risk at 1.8/5, meaning the rated factors are mostly sound, with one or two areas worth watching.
What pushes the score up: market / volatility (3.7/5).
Scoring well: sector / regulatory at 1.0/5.
Not yet researched: earnings quality, concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.
Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.
Risk Profile
- Annualised volatility (3yr)2/523.7
- Max drawdown from ATH5/598.0
- Beta vs S&P 5004/51.5
- Avg daily $ volume1/5224.5m
- Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched
- Debt / equitynot yet researched
- Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)1/514.6
- 3yr EPS volatilitynot yet researched
- Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
- Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched
- Board independence %not yet researched
- Share structurenot yet researched
- Litigation / audit historynot yet researched
- Sector regulatory exposure1/5low
Linked Assets
Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.
- Akamai Technologies AKAM+54% (moderate)same category: information technology, internet services & infrastructure
- GoDaddy GDDY+32% (weak)same category: information technology, internet services & infrastructure
- Analog Devices ADI+52% (moderate)same category: information technology
- NetApp NTAP+51% (moderate)same category: information technology
- Cisco CSCO+48% (moderate)same category: information technology
- Oracle Corporation ORCL+47% (moderate)same category: information technology
- F5, Inc. FFIV+46% (moderate)same category: information technology
- Workday, Inc. WDAY+44% (moderate)same category: information technology