ON Semiconductor ON
equity
Price History
The shaded fan is where this price has historically travelled over the months after a close like today’s. It is not a forecast: it has no view on direction, only on distance.
Over 3 months from Sep 2026, roughly two-thirds of past moves landed between $53.69 and $91.22; nine in ten between $45.25 and $108.22.
Tested against this asset’s own history: across 302 past 3-month windows, the price actually landed inside the two-thirds band 71% of the time. The gap from 68% is the model’s error — real returns have fatter tails than the maths assumes, so the band gets breached more often than it claims.
Time underwater
How far below its previous all-time high the price sat, each month. 0% means a new high.
Worst drawdown: −94%, peaking Jul 2000 and bottoming Sep 2002 — 210 months below the prior high before recovering.
DCA Backtest
- Invested
- $31,700
- Value today
- $289,794
- Return
- +814.2%
- Months invested
- 317
Scenarios
Inflation — the same contributions merely keeping pace with CPI would be $46,141 today, so the real (inflation-adjusted) return is +528.1%.
Lump sum instead — $31,700 all at once in May 2000: $114,867 (+262.4%) — DCA came out ahead.
Worst timing — same monthly amount started at the all-time high (May 2026): $412.24 on $500 invested (-17.6%).
⚠ Price returns only — dividends are not included. This understates the true return of dividend-paying shares, and any comparison against crypto (which pays no dividends) is biased against equities by roughly the dividend yield, compounded.
If this saved you a spreadsheet — buy me a coffee.
Every start month at once
Each cell is the return-to-date of £/$/€100-a-month DCA started that month. Click a cell to load it in the backtest above. The ringed cell is the all-time-high start — the worst timing scenario.
| J | F | M | A | M | J | J | A | S | O | N | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | ||||||||||||
| 2001 | ||||||||||||
| 2002 | ||||||||||||
| 2003 | ||||||||||||
| 2004 | ||||||||||||
| 2005 | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2026 |
About ON Semiconductor
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is a Taiwanese multinational semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company. Headquartered in Hsinchu Science Park, it is one of the world's largest non-US companies by market capitalisation. It holds a commanding majority in the semiconductor foundry market, accounting for approximately 70% of the global market share. As the leading dedicated contract chipmaker, it serves as the main supplier for Nvidia, Apple, Broadcom, and Qualcomm. (Wikipedia)
It's a listed company categorised under information technology and semiconductors, with a market cap of about $27.2B.
It rates High Risk at 3.0/5, meaning several rated factors score badly, so this carries materially more risk than a typical holding.
What pushes the score up: market / volatility (4.7/5) and earnings quality (4.0/5).
Scoring well: sector / regulatory at 1.0/5.
Not yet researched: concentration, governance. These are excluded from the score rather than guessed, so the real risk may be higher than what’s shown.
Ratings summarise sourced facts against fixed rules — not investment advice, and no substitute for your own diligence.
Risk Profile
- Annualised volatility (3yr)4/553.0
- Max drawdown from ATH5/594.4
- Beta vs S&P 5005/52.3
- Avg daily $ volume1/5955.7m
- Float % of shares outstandingnot yet researched
- Debt / equity3/50.74
- Interest coverage (EBIT / interest)not yet researched
- 3yr EPS volatility4/546.8
- Largest customer, % of revenuenot yet researched
- Geographic revenue concentrationnot yet researched
- Board independence %not yet researched
- Share structurenot yet researched
- Litigation / audit historynot yet researched
- Sector regulatory exposure1/5low
Linked Assets
Same sector, or return-correlated — worth knowing what else might move if this one does.
- NXP Semiconductors NXPI+72% (strong)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Analog Devices ADI+65% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Texas Instruments TXN+63% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Microchip Technology MCHP+59% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Monolithic Power Systems MPWR+55% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Advanced Micro Devices AMD+54% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Broadcom AVGO+54% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors
- Nvidia NVDA+54% (moderate)same category: information technology, semiconductors